.svg)
Imagine your development team just rolled out a new feature that fixes a bug but now some parts of your software that used to work flawlessly have stopped working. This is a common risk in Agile development, where changes come fast and often.
Since Agile moves quickly with constant updates, regression testing is a key part of making sure the software stays reliable. With each new update, there’s a risk that changes might impact parts of the software that were already working well. Regression testing reduces that risk by checking that earlier features still work as expected after changes, helping to keep the software stable and dependable as it evolves.
Regression testing is a type of testing that makes sure that any existing software functions keep working correctly even after the modification of code. The process of retesting the previously tested features in order to find any flaws or modifications that harm the system’s functioning or its stability.
{{cta-image}}
What Does Regression Testing in Agile Mean?
Regression testing in Agile isn’t just testing—it’s the safeguard that makes sure new code doesn’t cause any problem in the area of existing functionality. Since Agile focuses on fast development, each sprint brings new updates and enhancements. But how do you make sure these don’t mess up the parts that were already stable? That’s where regression testing becomes more important. Every time a feature is added or a bug is fixed, regression testing re-examines the entire system, hunting down any bug in the software.
Importance of Regression Testing in Agile
In Agile, where there's iterative development and change is frequent, that’s why regression testing becomes even more vital. Here are several key reasons:
- Almost all of the focus in the Agile framework is on working on sprint-specific features and tasks. Often this targeted focus means they don’t consider the impact of their changes on the entire system.
- Any change made to one area of software has the potential to create unintended consequences in other areas of the codebase, so we need to catch this early.
- If test coverage is comprehensive and well maintained, regression testing serves to inform you about areas in the system that have been recently changed and to determine how.
- Continuous integration requires seamless code merging. It guarantees that each integration is flawless and there is no disruption to the existing version of the technology.
Why Regression Testing is Essential in Agile Development?
To keep up with the fast pace of Agile, it’s vital to maintain high software quality. Whether in agile or waterfall, speed and flexibility are key elements of technical development, but without regression testing, there’s a good chance those fast, flexible cycles will slip past errors.
Maintain Software Quality
The faster the speed in Agile, the higher the chance of errors and flaws. Regression testing is a safeguard that ensures that new features or improvements will not reduce the quality of the software. Basically, it is about keeping a stable and reliable foundation on which the software keeps building and evolving.
Maintaining Stability with Speed
Speed is the main focus of agile, but speed without stability can create chaos. This is why regression testing helps teams maintain pace without losing reliability. It ensures that new changes don’t break the stability of already tested and working code.
Enhance Confidence
When developers make changes to the system knowing they can do so with thorough regression testing, any problems will be found early and the system will not unexpectedly break after making changes. Developers and stakeholders both derive value from this piece of mind. This helps the team be a little more creative and a little braver with new features, but this only puts the software forward, not sacrificing stability or reliability.
Boost User Satisfaction
Having stable, reliable software is absolutely key to satisfying the user. Regression testing makes sure that if we add new features or make updates, it doesn’t break the user experience by introducing defects. In Agile, high-quality software becomes a continuous commitment to delivering a seamless and consistent user experience, keeping users satisfied.
When to Perform Regression Testing in Agile?
Regression testing is a continuous function across the development lifecycle. It happens as often as Agile teams use particular techniques and procedures. Ultimately, the goal is to find and fix regressions early on so that you can keep the software reliable as it gets better.
Here are some situations where we need to conduct regression testing:
- After committing new code: Every time new code is incorporated, new regression tests assist testers in verifying that none of the existing functions have been affected.
- At the initiation and conclusion of each iteration or sprint cycle: Before the beginning of a sprint, the regression tests check that the basic functionality has not been affected. Lastly, tests make sure that the newly developed component does not have negative impacts on the previous one.
- Before release or production deployment: Regression tests are performed before the software is released into production, and their aim is to find out if there are any problems still existing in this system so that they make the release more stable.
- After critical bug fixes or emergency patch releases: Every time a serious bug is solved or an emergency patch is deployed, regression testing makes sure that the change did not negatively impact other functions.
- Following substantial code refactoring or platform updates: Regression tests are needed as a major change, such as code structuring or platform upgrade, is expected to occur and must be made sure that the system continues to run properly after the changes.
Example: Suppose an e-commerce platform developing team uses Agile sprints as the working model. In one sprint, the team added a new feature called the Wishlist. Once the code is committed, regression tests are performed to ensure that other features, such as Add to Cart and Checkout, work in a proper way. However, at the end of the sprint, while implementing the feature, regression tests are again performed to check the compatibility of the Wishlist feature with other modules before the feature goes to production.
How Much Test Coverage is Required?
The amount of test coverage depends on the Agile project.
- The main focus is that 70–90% of your code should be regression tested.
- 100% test coverage isn't necessary; low-risk areas may not need exhaustive testing.
- The best impact comes from focusing on the high-priority, frequently used application areas.
- Prioritize core functionalities and user-critical features for thorough testing.
- Balance test coverage with testing efficiency to avoid excessive time spent on low-impact areas.
Effective Regression Testing Strategy in Agile Environments
In Agile environments, where frequent updates are the norm, the ability to maintain software quality depends on an efficient regression testing strategy guided by Strategic Regression Testing in Software Development. Here is a clear approach to ensuring that regression testing is efficient and reliable.
Using Sanity and Smoke Test Cases
Conducting a sanity and smoke test before a regression test can save time for the testing team. A sanity test is a quick run of the application’s core functionality before continuing with more thorough testing for a new release. This is an informal confirmation that the basic features indeed work as expected.
On the other hand, smoke testing, in which we run tests from a subset of test cases dealing with the main and critical workflow of the software like opening the software and logging, etc. These are written to execute quickly along with these tests.
Identify Area Prone to Error
Let us focus on the test scenarios, which will most often fail. There are some parts of the application that are much more vulnerable to the problems; even slight changes of code can bring up the problems. Test these high-risk areas thoroughly during each sprint and focus your regression tests on these high-risk areas.
For example, if you look at customer-reported bugs or failures on past releases, you can add those areas into the regression test suite so that you can make sure that these areas are covered in future tests.
Prioritization of Test Cases
The importance of different test cases is not the same. First, run the high-priority features, which are most important to the application or really bad if they break. This enables major defects to be found early in the cycle while allowing less important defects to be run later.
Finding Bugs
Bug detection is one of the main goals of regression testing. If this test is run, you can closely analyze the result to find defects caused by recent changes. The log of these issues can be used with automated bug-tracking software to make it easier to address before they affect the release.
Communication
Regression testing requires good communication between the development, testing, and product teams to be successful. This means that all parties must know what changes were made in each sprint, what features were used for testing, and what the results of these tests were. Feedback loops ensure that everyone stays on the same level and that problems are resolved quickly.
Common Challenges of Regression Testing in Agile
Here are the common challenges faced during regression testing in Agile environments:
Frequent Changes in Code
Although agile development’s quick changes and continuous feedback do lead to fewer problems, regression testing remains a pain. To avoid having regenerated regression test scripts in mid-project, continuous testing is required and no feature should break.
Lack of Communication
Agile teams are cross-functional, and hence regression testing can also be cross-functional, but often if there is no proper communication between the developers, testers, and other stakeholders, then regression testing can go wrong. Lack of clear documentation and specification of the change may lead to inefficient or inadequate testing, and thus possible defects may be overlooked.
Test Cases Maintenance Pressure
After every sprint, expanding test suites must also be updated, maintained, and analysed. To stay on track with new features and code updates, teams are often revising or adding new test cases all the time. The effort continues, with pressure to keep the regression suite relevant.
Regression Test Suite Expansion
Since the regression test suite grows bigger with each sprint, test execution time can become longer. Extensive test suites can stretch out the feedback loop, therefore potentially losing time in development when the tests are not well tuned.
Automation Test Skills
Implementing regression test automation accelerates the process, but it needs skilled testers fluent in automation testing frameworks like Selenium or Appium, and all kinds of building such a team can be expensive, especially for teams that have never practiced Agile before and the novice in the automation space will also slow the testing speed as the code evolves.
{{cta-image-second}}
Final Words
Regression testing is important in Agile development since the software is frequently updated and changed by regular updates. This helps so that new features or bug fixes don’t impact existing functionality. Agile teams can move confidently through the Agile cycles with minimized risk of errors by focusing on high-risk areas, prioritizing test cases, and maintaining a fast and thorough regression suite.
Alphabin is a specialist in regression test automation to support this process. Alphabin helps teams deploy fast feedback and high-quality, stable software releases by helping you with the best software testing strategies and frameworks to automate faster.
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)