Emulator vs Simulator in Mobile App Testing: Key Differences

With over 6.1 billion smartphone users expected by 2028, how will your app be unique in a highly saturated and competitive environment? 

It is all about proper mobile app testing, or rather, the lack of it in most cases. Good usability and high-level user experience are the major factors in the current conditions of market competition.

That is where tools like emulators and simulators are really useful. They’re the backbone of testing and aid developers in ensuring functionality, performance, and usability. Imitating Android devices is slightly easier than iOS devices because it comes up with a reliable testing environment and mimics both Android software and hardware. 

But here’s another crucial question: then what are the criteria for selecting the right tool to use when testing an app? Alright, let us break it down and analyze it step-by-step.

{{cta-image}}

What is an Emulator?

Emulators are effective software testing tools that have the intention to mimic the features of a target hardware device with its features, such as software & hardware. These virtual devices make it possible for testers to test their applications inside a virtual device without having to use a physical device. 

Of all the categories of emulators, mobile emulators are especially helpful since they offer the chance to test applications on all sorts of devices without the need for physical gadgets.

• Emulators translate the instruction set architecture (ISA) of the target device to a form of executable that the host machine can understand.
• The translation process lets the emulator behave exactly like the target device.
• It emulates both the hardware and software features of the target device in emulated behavior.
• Emulators are useful for testing a wide range of applications, including:some text
  • Mobile apps
  • Games
  • Various software programs

When to Use Emulator?

Emulators are ideal for several scenarios in mobile application development and testing:

• Early-stage app testing.
• Cross-browser testing.
• For cost-effective testing.
• Performance testing and functionality across various hardware configurations
• Debugging apps for hardware and software interactions.

Example

• BlueStacks: It provides running Android apps on Windows and Mac.
• Xcode: It allows one to run iOS apps on Windows and Mac.

What is a Simulator?

Now you have a good idea about the emulator, so let's move ahead. Unlike the emulator, the simulator only mimics the software environment of the real mobile device. Lightweight tools that focus on the operating system rather than the physical one.

The simulator created the virtual environment of different software aspects like operating systems and user interfaces without replicating physical appearances. Instead of inserting a real device into the simulation, they leverage the resources of the host system to simulate the behavior of the target device so that testers and developers can run applications and utilize their functionality.

When to Use Simulator?

Simulators are best suited for specific scenarios in mobile application development and testing:

• Quick validations of app behavior.
• UI/UX testing.
• Running lightweight tests during development.

Example

• iOS Simulator: Used for testing iOS apps on macOS, it replicates the iOS environment without mimicking the actual device hardware. Ideal for testing UI, layout, and basic app behavior.

What are the Key Differences between Emulator and Simulator?

Emulators and simulators are used to ensure that software and hardware work and to test for all known or unknown behaviors for real devices or systems. They do a similar thing, just with some differences in how they work, use cases, and many more. It is important to determine the difference between emulator and a simulator to know which one is right for you. Here's a detailed comparison:

Choosing the Right Tool for Mobile Application Testing

It is important that the right tool for mobile testing be chosen that will help you meet your testing goals. Virtual testing tools like emulators and simulators have their benefits. 

Emulators mimic all features of a mobile device, including the software and the hardware; therefore, they can be used in testing that involves the hardware components of the device. However, they are slightly slower due to the use of emulation of hardware components. 

On the other hand, some simulators mimic only the software part and are faster and more efficient in testing software facilities. Quick validations and UI/UX testing are perfectly appropriate for simulators. As for emulators, detailed testing regarding interaction with the hardware would be useful.

Advantages of Emulators and Simulators

Emulator and simulator create simulations of the existing system; thus, practices can be done easily without compromising the original system. Here you will find out the advantages of an emulator and simulator:

Advantages of Emulator

Below is a list of reasons to choose an emulator:

• Accurate Hardware Testing: It’s a mimic of hardware and software, which provides the ability to do detailed device-specific testing.
• Cost-Effective: Remove the need for physical devices.
• Debugging Tools: Offers low-level debugging and error tracking
• Cross-Platform: It tests compatibility over devices and operating systems.
• Customizable: Specific hardware conditions and configurations are simulated.

Advantages of Simulator

Want to know why to choose a simulator? Keep reading.

• Ease of Use: Lightweight and faster setup.
• High-Level Testing: Perfect for app-level and UI/UX testing.
• Performance: Because of minimal hardware simulation, faster than emulators.
• Resource-Friendly: They use fewer system resources.
• Platform Tools: Built with SDKs (like the iOS Simulator) in mind for easy developer iteration.

Limitations of Virtual Devices

As I said, virtual devices such as emulator and simulator have a lot of benefits in mobile testing, but they also have some limitations. The said tools cannot mimic the real mobile device actions and some of the features cannot be tested with reliable results. 

For example, battery, cellular interfaces, and camera are some of the parameters that are difficult to emulate using virtual devices. Further, virtual devices often do not mimic the typical user interaction with the data, touch, feel, and gesture imitation of real devices. 

Thus, one must combine the testing on emulators and simulators with testing on real devices to achieve the task of having overall mobile testing. This is achieved through the optimally balanced design that enhances the functionality of the application under real usage and thereby guarantees a good user experience.

Difference Between Real Device vs Virtual Device

You must know that both virtual and real devices are very important for testing applications, and each is used to help us test applications in different scenarios. Their differences can help in selecting the right approach to get the best results in testing.

Real Device

• A tangible device that operates exactly as the end-user would experience.
• Offers accurate results for app behavior, performance, and compatibility testing under real-world conditions.
• Supports testing failures like GPS, accelerometer, camera, and other hardware components.
• Provide testing under actual network conditions, including varying signal strengths and real-time delays.
• Multiple devices may need to be purchased separately for cross-platform testing.
• Require manual setup and switching between devices during testing.

Virtual Device (Emulator and Simulator)

• Maintain a real device environment either through an emulator or simulator.
• May not replicate real-world behavior, especially for hardware-specific features.
• Limited or no support for testing physical components like GPS, camera, or sensor.

{{cta-image-second}}

Is it Possible to Use Virtual Devices for a Complete Testing Process?

Of course not, as virtual testing devices are great in some conditions, but if the whole testing is based only on virtual devices, problems may occur. Let’s see where we need virtual devices and where real devices fill up the gap:

Virtual Devices Excel At

1. Early stage testing: Initial app testing stages are best suited for virtual devices. This way, a tester can prove the given simple functionality or such works not only on various versions of OS but also on a range of devices.
2. Cost Efficiency: This helps decrease the general testing costs since virtual devices can be obtained without having to buy several physical devices.
3. Convenience: Virtual devices are easier to test with as they can be set up instantly and run on standard hardware setups.

The Gap in Real Devices Can Fill

1. Real-World Conditions: Virtual testing devices can’t replicate the finer points of real-world network fluctuations and battery performance, or the way hardware can fail, but real devices can.
2. Hardware-Specific Feature: This way, features, such as GPS, cameras, fingerprint scanners, or even accelerometers, can only be tested on real devices to be completely accurate.
3. Performance Testing: App performance data captured on real devices—not virtual devices—is the most accurate representation of performance under real-world conditions.

Balancing Real Devices and Virtual Devices

When these two devices are balanced, mobile app testing is made efficient. Here’s how to do it:

• Start with Virtual Devices: For general testing, most of the initial rapid testing cycles, use emulators and simulators.
• Switch to Real Devices for Final Testing: In real terms, it is possible to check app behavior before the app has been launched in the market.
• Combine Tools for Comprehensive Coverage: Appropriate proper tools to make the best out of it.

Conclusion

At last, I concluded by saying that choosing between an emulator and a simulator depends on the app’s testing requirements. Emulators excel in replicating hardware-software interactions for early-stage testing and debugging, while simulators offer speed and simplicity for quick validation.

However, real devices are still needed to understand real conditions and specific characteristics of the hardware platform. A good combination of all three guarantees the reliability and efficiency of the application, as well as the flawless experience of the user. Contact us for more information about the advanced software testing services in USA.